Into the void: What the decision in Yvanova means

by California Lawyer, TFMetals Report This is too important to not share. I found out about this last week, and wanted to get an update out there. But, there are absolute legal wizards on this who are far better and concise at stating the importance of this decision by the California Supreme Court, UPHOLDING the right of someone who claims their home was taken illegally by a shady bank that.

The Yvanova string of cases in California are based upon some vague notion of whether a void assignment (e.g., past the cutoff date) could be ratified by the trust, trustee or trust beneficiaries. Firstly, the trust can only operate through a trustee. That is black letter law in every state. In REMIC Trusts the Trustee.

REO sales may not peak until 2013 Our services have not been reviewed or endorse by the government or your lender. Most lenders willingly work with agents on short sales. Why? Because most short sales are beneficial to a lender. If you accept our offer to help you on a short sale, your lender may not agree to a short sale or to modify your loan. We do offer a loan modification kit.

 · 1 thought on ” california supreme court grants petition for Review of Three Court of Appeal Cases Rejecting Glaski v. Bank of America ” . Pingback: California Supreme Court issues narrow holding that, post-foreclosure, borrowers have standing to assert wrongful foreclosure based on allegations that an underlying assignment is void | Consumer Finance Watch

Nor does our conclusion condemn complaints about districting to echo into a void.” The decision holds that the federal judiciary. Because something can be done doesn’t mean it should be done. We.

The Truth About Your Mortgage - Secrets the Banks Don't Want You to Know In seeking a finding that an assignment agreement was void, therefore, a plaintiff in Yvanova’s position is not asserting the interests of parties to the assignment; she is asserting her own interest in limiting foreclosure on her property to those with legal authority to order a foreclosure sale.

The Yvanova Supreme Court decision being one of those. This is called due process at work. The right to due process does not mean that one will always win, but it does mean that one will get a fair consideration.

Essentially, despite expounding on the issues for 30 pages, the opinion just stands for the unremarkable (and, largely, undisputed) proposition that a borrower has standing to sue for wrongful.

California Foreclosure Law: California Supreme Court Grants Review Of The Keshtgar Decision. the lead Yvanova decision involves a post-foreclosure claim of. (available if you are logged into.

Borrowers get some legal leverage in CFPB servicing rules Two Harbors 4Q earnings barely increase, miss expectations Two Harbors’ fourth-quarter core earnings marginally increased to $83.1 million, or $0.23 per share, barely missing analyst expectations. The news comes amid the firm’s recent announcement of.CFPB targets zombie foreclosures The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is probing "zombie" foreclosures, a phenomenon first revealed by Reuters last year, Michelle Conlin reports. Thousands of borrowers across the country were.